Questions of the day

You're right, it was hallo with an a.

.............well since he answered no more questions till 2mm

I think he deserves jail. No offense. He actually needs to die.

Well first of all he admitted murder in a book, and second he needs to have a death sentencing instead of 9-33 years.

He does not deserve to die, if he was killed for this it would be a double jeopardy and that is illegal in itself.

bennet3 wrote:He does not deserve to die, if he was killed for this it would be a double jeopardy and that is illegal in itself.

This is a separate crime. Double Jeopardy would only be if he were convicted of killing his wife, as he's already been acquitted from that crime and cannot be tried again.

This particular case was just him being stupid. The punishment he got does not fit the crime. This should be a year or two at most in a medium security prison. So then why is he getting almost a decade in jail at the least? Because the public still hasn't forgotten about his wife's murder trial, and a great deal of people believe that he got away with murder. I suspect the judge in this trial was one of those people.

The only reason he got this long of a sentence is because they are judging him for his past crime, he should have been convicted then, but he was not. So in turn they are judging him for his murder and that is a double jeopardy.

They can't legally bring crimes which he has already been acquitted of into their minds when making the court ruling, you're right when you say that would constitute double jeopardy.

But he isn't being charged with the killing of his wife. It is a separate case altogether. Pubic opinion of OJ has been lowered due to the trial of his wife's murder, but because the judge and jury took into account OJ's history of misdeeds when they made the ruling, that doesn't constitute double jeopardy. You have to be legally charged with the same crime you were acquitted of for it to be considered double jeopardy.

I'm not trying to say he is "officially" being convicted with this again, but you can't deny that the decisions that were made were based off of that.

Well of course.

He was basically on lifetime probation after the murder trial.

I.E. if he messed up again, no matter how small the offense, he'd serve some serious time.

Wow this is one big argument.

Not really, how is it an argument when my and Latios have the same point.

wow! nice *NEW*

QOTD: I know this maybe type old but do you think; Are we really wasting our time in Iraq?

Idk i half and half this besides for the first reason of 9/11 the other reason (tryin to give them democracy) is just a waste of time i mean let them kill each other y r we helping them for a pointless cause hopefully barrack obama keeps his word and sends r soldiers home

Nah,I don't think so.You see,in order to keep our freedom we have to send soldiors to fight.If we didn't fight,we'd be slaves by now.

Oh, that's your reasoning? So we went to Vietnam, Korea, and Israel, to defend the homeland?

Yeah.I mean,without the soldiors going off to fight,where would we be right now?

No, right now if we wouldn't have gone to Israel in the late 1960s and early 1970s that area of the world would not hate us like they do now. And we should have never been in Vietnam, Korea we were just paranoid about the Soviets, what we did there allowed a leader like North Korea's Kim Jong il to come in to power.

You don't expect to get friendship from the countries you go to war with right?But I agree with you as well.

ok....wasnt tht nice... anyway *NEW*

QOTD: Alot of people say that 9/11 was really the governments doing and not terrorist, based on a series of facts that will take forever to mention. So, do u think its the governmant or terrorist?

I think its was still done by terrorist b/c first of all 1 of the most important facts (based on theories) is the government killed thousands of people for money if the government DID do that wtf?!? they shouldve been overrun by now but besides tht point i think the terrorist still did it mainly b/c of the warning they gave us the day b4 the atk which "we" thought was a joke then BAM! well thts all i can say about this questions =P very long answer. hopefully some of u get wut im saying here

JustBlaze1594 wrote:ok....wasnt tht nice... anyway *NEW*

QOTD: Alot of people say that 9/11 was really the governments doing and not terrorist, based on a series of facts that will take forever to mention. So, do u think its the governmant or terrorist?

I think its was still done by terrorist b/c first of all 1 of the most important facts (based on theories) is the government killed thousands of people for money if the government DID do that wtf?!? they shouldve been overrun by now but besides tht point i think the terrorist still did it mainly b/c of the warning they gave us the day b4 the atk which "we" thought was a joke then BAM! well thts all i can say about this questions =P very long answer. hopefully some of u get wut im saying here

I think Terrorists.

The "the government caused 911" is just a crackpot theory, at least that's what I think.

There's no way the government would kill thousands of innocents just to prove a point or strengthen national opinion of a certain party.

Terrorists especially because they hijacked a plane, what kind of goverment does some stupid crap like that. Its idiotic and immoral.

=P yea kinda figured those answers *NEW* i got this one from my friends arguing on the bus caused a bit of a commotion and even the people on the bus were in on it. this question i will let u guys answer and tho it may seem simple, it rly isnt once u rly get into a argue for example this is how it all started a talk about football track then wrestle caused this ? to pop in my head.

QOTD: What is the difference between a SPORT and a GAME >=P take it into thought REAL ANSWERS PEOPLE!

Sport:A sport is a hobby you would play just to get active.
Game:A game is something that depends on a record and it's where people will come to watch you,also you have a scoreboard and all that.

well i can consider tht -_- poor activity tho, o well =P *NEW*

QOTD: (Thanks to help from my dad) Do you think Obama will be another George Bush or actually keep his promise and give us "change"?

I hope so i mean he promised alot and it better happen for example he "said" tht by 2010 all soldiers in Iraq should b home <_< arent we all wishing fo that.